10/26/2021 0 Comments Coalesce App For Mac Osx
An extremely simple tool for installing PostgreSQL on a Mac is available by downloading Postgres.app. He has no need.Postgres.app for Mac OSX. - PIN Code Unlock with a Duress PIN option for those tricky situations.That whole claim of a non-programatic way of setting a flag is bullshit. - Face ID/Touch ID Unlock for the ultimate in convenience, security and speed. Supporting the open source Password Safe and KeePass formats. Strongbox is an application for keeping all your passwords safely stored and protected by one master password.
![]() Coalesce App Software Development KitFor example, Apple might decide to change CFString to always convert data to BADC-byte-order UTF-32 under the hood for better efficiency on Vax. Personally, I prefer to work with humans who can screw up and admit it, rather than arrogant jerks who screw up and try to conceal that fact and fool as many people as possible into thinking it was someone else's fault somehow.Or the SPI (System Programming Interface, the private equivalent of an API) takes advantage of inside knowledge of how some data structures are designed but which could change in the future as functionality is added to the class in question. Vladimir admitted his mistake and has even tried to help correct the misunderstanding of people on Slashdot who did not read or understand his post, but just read the inflammatory title of this article and started gibbering about things with no real understanding of what they were talking about. Android SDK (software development kit) It is a set of tools.Everyone screws up. Supported Operating Systems - OS X.:-(So you see, Apple has only three choices: A. If Apple publishes the SPI as API, FireFox uses it, and Apple changes the data structure, Firefox breaks, and with "luck", so do Photoshop and Word. Thus, it is safe for Safari to use any API or SPI. In a way that would break an SPI, all they have to do is rev Safari to not use that SPI. If Apple needs to change an internal data structure in CF, Foundation, etc. :-D They could make such a change and still support the public APIs, but if they had an API that allowed you to arbitrarily manipulate the bytes under the hood, they'd be stuck.The thing about Safari is that it is effectively insulated from SPI changes because it comes out with OS releases.Having an app like Safari exercise them allows the engineers to figure out what works and what doesn't so that they don't get stuck supporting an API that isn't scalable, is hard to enhance, or isn't easily maintainable. :-) And as you noted, many of those SPIs that Safari is trying out might become APIs at some point in the future. That said, since it's safe for them to do so, where's the harm? There's no monopoly involved, certainly. It's a no-win.The only thing one could possibly argue is that Safari shouldn't be using the SPI, either, to put them on equal footing. Publish the API and break it later, in which case developers scream again. Publish that portion of the API, in which case they're stuck with that internal architecture and can't ever change it to improve performance, add features, etc., or C.Just don't come crying when your app crashes on launch after a software update or whatever. If you don't care about that, use the SPI. Apple limits its public API exposure to ensure that the APIs are sustainable so third-party code doesn't break. It's not a vast fruit-wing conspiracy. The reason FF3 was "suddenly" slower than FF2 is they changed from Carbon to Cocoa (2 totally different frameworks) and the new feature is only applied to Cocoa apps. So I really don't see the comparison to MS at all.Also one of the comments on the blog is from a webkit developer at Apple who says "yeah, these APIs basically suck, and they are here for backwards compatibility with Tiger, and they aren't stable, and cause us hundreds of hours of work dealing with regressions, so don't use them, use the perfectly acceptable and documented configuration setting, if there is anything in these APIs that should be made public, it will be once it is stabilized and reliable" He then gives examples of other APIs that have gone through the same process.In the end this is 100% open to the public, any software can use this configuration setting to get around this potential performance bottleneck. The Firefox dev found this configuration, added 2 lines of XML to firefox, and bam, done, speedy. I clicked "Yahoo Mail Beta" in IE 6 while emulating X86 and Windows XP same time. Firefox developers have no right to speak about OS X too.On my Quad G5 with MS Virtual PC 7, I noticed something by accident. It's not like OS-X says "oooo Firefox, quick make it run twice as slow". How this is news at all baffles me, that sounds like a normal day in my life.Oh give me a break, if you use an undocumented API for something that does not mean you "cripple" other pieces of software. Guess what else displays them fine with total 3% CPU on a site like Digg? KDE Konqueror 3.5.8 installed by Fink project running under unstable OS X Leopard X11! Is it another Apple conspiracy? (!) :)The programmatic disabling of coalesced updates should not be public API. "Evil MS fonts" is not excuse anymore, Opera 9.2.6 or 9.5.beta can display them fine. I mean, Apple actually purchased licenses of MS Fonts from Microsoft and they are included in Leopard now. It can't display Turkish chars right no matter what you do too. First of all, I heard they don't use OS X native Text Rendering to begin with. First thing I did was trashing Firefox.app in my Applications and installing Opera 9 as a old favorite, alternative browser.I wish I was a OS X developer knowing OS internals and possible reasons for that scandal performance. Jasper font downloadEither they expose internal structures that can't be depended on, or they are part of something inside a framework that may not be fully formed. )Many of the private methods that WebKit uses are private for a reason. It's nothing more than a pref that we can examine from Safari-land, so linking to that is just silly. It's not private or magic. Technically it's wrong though, since we turn off the coalesced updates for any app that uses WebKit! This includes drawing they do that doesn't even use WebKit.As for the window display throttling, that was a pref designed for Safari (that we don't even use any more). We aren't really happy with that code in WebKit, but we had to do it to avoid performance regressions in apps that embedded WebKit. Be careful when you dig into WebKit code, since we may continue to use the WK method even though it's not public API just because we need to work on Tiger. Many of these methods have become public over time (CG stuff in Leopard for example).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJason ArchivesCategories |